Arnold Morales, a visitor from the US, volunteered for some Western Ground Parrot surveys in 2003. His account of the experience is a reminder of what those early surveys were like. It is a bit shocking to read that using the GPS to mark the starting point of a walk into the bush was not standard practice. Arnold, with an electrical engineering background, also envisaged the need for an Automated Recording Unit (ARU)and its salient characteristics about 5 years before the research team began to investigate this possibility. Now ARUs are invaluable tools in monitoring and survey of Western Ground Parrots.
This account first appeared in a Friends of the Western Ground Parrot Newsupdate in 2004.
Living In The Bush
Learning About Western Ground Parrots
A Few Problems
A Couple of Successes
Technology
Reflections
This account first appeared in a Friends of the Western Ground Parrot Newsupdate in 2004.
A volunteer’s story
It was an offer I couldn’t refuse.
Brenda Newbey, a friend, learned that I planned to visit Australia
for several months and invited me to participate in searches for the elusive
Western Ground Parrot (WGP). The searches would require camping in the bush,
morning and evening treks to various locations, and a bit of paperwork. I saw
the invitation as an opportunity to see and live in the Australian wilderness,
to meet Aussies, and to help the environment, and I immediately volunteered.
Brenda offered to teach me everything I needed to know, but I don’t think she
realized how little I knew.
I knew little about camping or living in the bush, I knew
little about birds or how to count them, I didn’t know much about Australia,
and I didn’t know what to expect. My preparation consisted of Bausch and Lomb
10x50 binoculars and a military-issue survival knife, and I learned later that
I didn’t need either.
Living In The Bush
My first trip to the bush was a personal disaster. I
borrowed a 1-person tent from my brother, Robert, that he had bought in the
U.S. during a visit. He had not used the tent, so I assumed it was OK. It
wasn’t. It was too small, and it leaked along the seams. One rainy night I woke
up and felt water on my feet. I tried to keep my feet dry by bending my knees,
but the water kept creeping toward me. Meanwhile, a couple of mosquitoes had
entered the tent through a break in the net zipper and were driving me crazy,
and a horde of mosquitoes were queued up on the outside of the net waiting to
attack. I eventually fled the tent and waited for daylight in Brenda’s Suzuki.
Lesson learned – I soon bought a top-quality tent, a comfortable sleeping bag,
and a self-inflating air mattress, and I started keeping the door net
completely zipped while I slept.
Water, I learned, is a problem in the bush. It’s like living
on a boat. There is never enough water to use freely. The challenge, I figured
out, is to have enough water by using as little as necessary to stretch the
supply. I eventually realized that dishes don’t really have to be well-rinsed
after washing, that human beings don’t need daily showers to survive (three
days is my limit), and that clothing can be worn for more than one day without
serious adverse effects. Within a few days I began to consciously conserve
water, especially when bathing (start at the top and work down), but Brenda set
the standard for water consumption and was always concerned about my water use.
So, I eventually began to take field baths while she was asleep or away from camp – another form of survival.
Thanks to good planning, food was not a problem -- we
enjoyed good hot food every day, complete with wine or port. One night we made
damper in the campfire, with beer and a handful of raisins. Real gourmet
dining, bush style.
I eventually learned to manage OK, and even enjoyed a few
conveniences. I could not always get ABC radio with my Walkman but my electric
toothbrush never let me down, and I drank hot coffee every morning. I was
content.
Learning About Western Ground Parrots
There’s really not much to learn about WGPs because
remarkably little is known about them. They live only in a few well-defined
areas near the south coast of Western Australia, but nobody is really sure.
They fly only near dawn and dusk, but nobody is really sure. They are
declining, but nobody is really sure. In fact, very few people have even seen a
WGP. I think the only things that we know about WGPs with certainty are that they exist, and that few remain. The
rest is rumor, but nobody is really sure. At least, so it seems to me.
My assignment would be to count WGPs in various locations --
once at dawn, and once at dusk. I first had to learn to identify WGPs, and that
was the difficult part. Unlike ideal children, WGPs are heard but are seldom
seen. This meant, of course, that the bulky binoculars that I had transported
half way around the world were useless, and that I had to learn to identify
WGPs by their call.
Fortunately, Brenda had a “training” audio tape that would
make me an expert. Well, not quite.
The tape contained a WGP “rising” call, and several “level”
calls. The rising call was very distinctive and was easy to identify. The level
calls were not very distinctive and were similar to calls of other birds (and a
cricket, I would later learn). My only hope was to hear rising calls in the
bush, so I asked whether the WGPs typically used rising calls or level calls.
Nobody knew (of course). I felt doomed but proceeded in the hope that somehow I
would figure out who’s who in the bush.
At first, I accompanied Brenda. She taught me how to use a
GPS, how to log calls, when to begin listening, and when to cease. These
“mechanics” were fairly easy to learn. Unfortunately we heard no “classic” WGP
rising calls during these training sessions, heard many level calls that
probably weren’t WGP calls, and a very few level calls that probably were. I
couldn’t distinguish between the “probable” and “not-probable” calls, and I
still felt doomed.
I then went out on my first solo “listen.” I knew I couldn’t
identify WGPs with certainty, so I established a policy of logging all calls
that sounded like WGP calls and annotating the uncertain calls with question
marks. Of course, all of my logged calls had question marks. This was a bit of
a copout that shifted the burden of identification to Brenda, who would later
grill me about the calls and would identify the probable WGP calls herself.
However, my call logs sometimes confirmed calls heard by others based on call
times and directions, so I felt I was contributing to the group effort.
A Few Problems
One morning I had difficulty getting a GPS fix. My GPS
coordinates drifted all over the place and I thought that the unit was not
operating correctly. Later that morning I checked with others and learned that
they all had similar GPS problems. Coalition forces were attacking Iraq at the
time and someone suggested that the U.S. may have been de-tuning the GPS
satellites for security reasons. I didn’t think so because President Clinton
had established a policy of not tampering with GPS satellite operation. Later I
read that the U.S. had shut down GPS satellites in three orbits for security
reasons, so even in the isolated Australian bush we were affected by events in
Iraq.
Three of the ladies went together to a new search area one
day and selected a departure point that apparently served as a kangaroo rest
area. All of a sudden they noticed that they were covered with ticks and
proceeded to desperately take off their clothes. The tactic apparently worked
because only one tick was later found on one of the ladies. There was a report that kangaroos were seen
running from the area in shock at the sight, but it was never confirmed.
Another volunteer, Anne Gadsby, had the misfortune to stall
in the middle of a pool of water during a transit to a new camp. This was a
minor tragedy because Ann’s car was fairly new and was very well maintained,
and muddy water seeped into the passenger compartment. We managed to tow the
car out of the water (Shapelle waded into the deep water and connected the tow
rope; I took photos), and Ann drove on to the new camp and quickly recovered
from the ordeal. The story has a good ending because CALM very generously paid
to have Anne’s car carpets cleaned.
One evening I walked alone through 1 km. of bush country
off Poison Creek Road in Cape Arid
National Park, deployed my equipment and waited. Soon I began hearing a stream
of what sounded like WGP level calls. There were dozens, perhaps hundreds of
calls, and I could not log them all. I returned to camp, reported what I’d
heard, and insisted that an experienced person (Brenda) return to the spot the
next day to confirm what I’d heard and to identify the source. I knew that
something was there, but I didn’t know what. The next evening several of us
returned to the site and listened. They were back – dozens of calls. We all
furiously scribbled report entries, but I noticed that Brenda stopped after a
few minutes. She obviously knew something that I didn’t know, but I doggedly
continued logging calls for another 30 minutes or so. When we regrouped Brenda
told us that the “calls” were generated by crickets or cicadas that mimicked
WGP calls. So now I had spurious cricket calls to worry about – it seemed like
biological warfare to me. Sorry, team. But at least we were the first (we
think) to encounter the cricket in that part of the coast.
Another evening I was dropped off in a new listening area,
moved several hundred meters into the bush to my assigned listening spot, and
once again deployed my equipment and listened. I was just about to call it a
night when I heard a clear classic WGP call in the distance, followed by
another. In fact, the calls sounded exactly like the calls I had heard on
Brenda’s training tape. I told Brenda about the calls when we regrouped, and
she told me she had played the tape about the time I heard the call. But
because of the distance and hill between us, she thought I may have heard a
live WGP responding to her tape. We calculated the distance between us and
decided to test whether I could have heard the tape. We drove near the area
where I had heard the calls and positioned ourselves on either side of a hill
separated by the calculated distance, then Brenda played the tape while I
listened. I did hear the call, so we reluctantly concluded that I had earlier
heard the tape, not a WGP. We had wasted at lot of time an effort only to prove
that I had been fooled by a tape recorder, but we at least confirmed that
sounds and calls can travel very long distances in the bush. .
A Couple of Successes
One evening the group deployed near in shore from Cheynes
Beach. All was relatively quiet until dark, when a noisy swarm of unidentified
birds flew onto the bush near shore. They landed all around us and seemed to be
everywhere. Nobody knew what they were, and arguments and discussions raged.
The birds, whatever they were, were simply not supposed to be there.
Later that night Brenda and I drove back to the area to
search for the birds. We parked and immediately heard a group a short distance
from the car, but the birds became quiet as we approached and another group
seemed to start calling a bit further away. This continued for a while. We
would hear the birds just a little further in the bush, they would quiet as we
approached, then we would hear more birds a bit further away. We finally
decided to thoroughly search a clump of vegetation where we were certain we had
heard birds but finally gave up after 20 minutes or so of probing. We
reluctantly decided to return to camp and heard another group of birds near the
car as we approached – the very place where we had started our search. These
birds were making us look like idiots.
The next day I developed a plan to identify them. I knew
that the birds flew in after dark, so instead of chasing them on the ground I
decided to wait for them and take their photo with my digital camera as they
flew in. The plan was simple. I would listen for the birds, take blind shots in
the darkness in the direction of their sounds, rely on the camera flash to
capture them, and hope. However, I didn’t properly prepare the camera. I forgot
to disable the camera red-eye feature, so the camera generated two flashes per
picture, and I didn’t replace the camera disk, so I had disk space for only
about six shots. Despite the poor preparation, I managed to capture one of the
birds in the corner of one of my blind shots and was able to zoom in on him
nicely. From the photo and the sounds they were making, the birds were
identified by Sarah Comer as Great-winged Petrels. They were unexpected over
land and were thought to be engaging in
pre-breeding behaviour.
During the last day of my last WGP expedition I felt a bit
frustrated. I had not heard one call during my many “listens” that I was
absolutely sure was a WGP call. As I began my final listening assignment I
thought it would be nice to finally hear a loud, clear, classic rising call
that I could definitely attribute to a WGP. Nice, but not likely in this new
area where no WGP had ever been found, and statistically almost impossible. But
it happened.
I heard two clear, loud rising calls from the same direction
minutes apart. When I met Brenda I first asked her whether she or anyone else
had played the training tape. No, she told me. Then I told her about the calls
that I had heard and asked her if she had heard them. No, she replied.
I couldn’t understand this. Brenda was listening no more
than a couple of hundred meters from me and I had heard the calls from her
direction, but she had not heard the calls. Brenda listed the calls as valid,
but I wanted confirmation. Brenda and I were scheduled to leave that day but
everyone else planned to stay a couple of more days, so I asked Shapelle to
listen in the area again. She did. She deployed five listeners in the area the
next day and three heard the call, including Shapelle. So on my last day I was
fortunate to have heard the eastern-most parrot ever heard. The longitude is
now known as the “Arnold” line, at least by me and my brother (who suggested
the name).
Technology
OK, I have a technical background and I’m biased. But I’ve
concluded after a lot of stumbling that a bit of technology would really help
us study and assess the WGP.
My first clue was the GPS. I had never used a GPS before my
visit to Australia and was taught only how to turn it on and read the
coordinates. Eventually I figured out that if I marked my starting point and
told the GPS to take me to the starting point, the GPS would tell me the
distance I traveled from the starting point as I walked. This helped me get to
my assigned locations because without this GPS feature I didn’t know, for
example, when I had walked 800 meters into the bush. The best I could do was
try to visualize the length of eight U.S. football fields – not easy in the
wilderness. Marking the starting point also gave me GPS steering information
back to my starting point – a feature that saved me from getting lost a couple
of nights. (This is now standard
practice)
My second clue was the bird ambush with my digital camera.
After the ambush I realized that a set of night-vision goggles would have
allowed us to see and identify the birds at night as they flew. With the
goggles we may have even been able to see WGPs in flight.
My third clue was use of two walkie talkies that I had
brought to Australia. Brenda and I used them to coordinate our “listening
distance” test. After the test I realized that giving a walkie talkie to each
person in the field, all tuned to the same frequency, would have helped us
coordinate our search efforts and would have allowed anyone that required
assistance to ask for help. They are essentially line-of-sight devices but
would be ideal for the typical flat WGP terrain.
My fourth clue were many hours I spent listening for WGPs. I
eventually realized that remote audio devices could do the job. They could be
programmed to listen during specific periods of the day (around dawn and dusk),
and could incorporate filters that pass only WGP call frequencies, eliminating
most unwanted sounds. They could be used continuously throughout the year, and
could be moved periodically for wide coverage. More sophisticated devices could
be developed that, for instance, respond only to specific WGP (or other bird)
call characteristics.
Reflections
To my surprise, CALM sent me a $160.00 check for my
volunteer efforts. I was proud of the check and the 1-yr. park pass they gave
me, and I reluctantly deposited the check in my bank account. I felt that I
should have paid CALM for the opportunity to volunteer -- the experience was
that good.
I met and worked with wonderful people, I saw the Australia
that few visitors see, and I have many fond memories of my WGP trips. The sight
of kangaroos in the wild (usually in pairs) was a real thrill. So were the
sunsets that I captured on my camera. So was the shore at Cape Arid. So was my
first taste of damper. So were many other sights and experiences that come to
mind almost randomly.
I told myself when I volunteered to search for Western
Ground Parrots that I would not simply tag along as a tourist but would
contribute in every way that I could. I think I did OK, but I’m certain that I received much more
than I gave.
Arnold Morales, March
2004.
No comments:
Post a Comment